<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t let Google fool you; tame your Flash!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.futtta.be/2008/05/06/dont-let-google-fool-you-tame-your-flash-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.futtta.be/2008/05/06/dont-let-google-fool-you-tame-your-flash-movies/</link>
	<description>Frank Goossens&#039; Twitterless twaddle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:09:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.futtta.be/2008/05/06/dont-let-google-fool-you-tame-your-flash-movies/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.futtta.be/?p=420#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>i think it&#039;s highly unlikely that google would ever go down that path, because;
* google embedding flash in their pages would offer no advantages to google or to the user.
* it would mean a change in the google interface, they&#039;re very conservative as far as their GUI is concerned.
* if they would want to change the way they show flash-results, they&#039;ll sooner do it the way they do for images (&lt;a href=&quot;http://images.google.be/imgres?imgurl=http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/kill_flash_nielsen.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/cinema/index.html&amp;start=130&amp;h=425&amp;w=306&amp;sz=79&amp;tbnid=DZb8NI2HILFdlM:&amp;tbnh=126&amp;tbnw=91&amp;hl=nl&amp;ei=WHUhSMjVA4qOwQGUo8D-Cw&amp;sig2=QK5-1tijrNGdSyY4r4U0Pw&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dflash%2Bsucks%26start%3D120%26gbv%3D1%26hl%3Dnl%26sa%3DN&quot; title=&quot;example of a google image result&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;show image in a frame and the context in a larger frame below that one&lt;/a&gt;)
* there are other ways to do this besides flashvars. having your flash contact a serverside app would be the first thing i would look into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s highly unlikely that google would ever go down that path, because;<br />
* google embedding flash in their pages would offer no advantages to google or to the user.<br />
* it would mean a change in the google interface, they&#8217;re very conservative as far as their GUI is concerned.<br />
* if they would want to change the way they show flash-results, they&#8217;ll sooner do it the way they do for images (<a href="http://images.google.be/imgres?imgurl=http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/kill_flash_nielsen.jpg&#038;imgrefurl=http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/cinema/index.html&#038;start=130&#038;h=425&#038;w=306&#038;sz=79&#038;tbnid=DZb8NI2HILFdlM:&#038;tbnh=126&#038;tbnw=91&#038;hl=nl&#038;ei=WHUhSMjVA4qOwQGUo8D-Cw&#038;sig2=QK5-1tijrNGdSyY4r4U0Pw&#038;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dflash%2Bsucks%26start%3D120%26gbv%3D1%26hl%3Dnl%26sa%3DN" title="example of a google image result" rel="nofollow">show image in a frame and the context in a larger frame below that one</a>)<br />
* there are other ways to do this besides flashvars. having your flash contact a serverside app would be the first thing i would look into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlowMo</title>
		<link>http://blog.futtta.be/2008/05/06/dont-let-google-fool-you-tame-your-flash-movies/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>SlowMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.futtta.be/?p=420#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Imho it shouldn&#039;t be hard for evil google to keep track of the object/embed tags as well.. And then they&#039;d still be able to show you the flash, without your site.

Next thing you know, you&#039;ll be adding object/embed tags with 1024bit hashes, to make sure the flash is shown on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imho it shouldn&#8217;t be hard for evil google to keep track of the object/embed tags as well.. And then they&#8217;d still be able to show you the flash, without your site.</p>
<p>Next thing you know, you&#8217;ll be adding object/embed tags with 1024bit hashes, to make sure the flash is shown on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
