Tag Archives: quirksmode

Firefox OS dead or just resting?

So Peter-Paul Koch (Quirksmode) declares Firefox OS dead. I’m afraid he’s right. A pity really, as I loved the idea of an entirely open web-based mobile OS. Mozillians don’t agree, saying they’re just not going offer Firefox OS phones through carriers any more.

Or maybe It’s just resting?

Customer: I wish to complain about this here fox what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.
Shopkeeper: Oh yes, uh, Firefox OS …What’s,uh…What’s wrong with it?
Customer: I’ll tell you what’s wrong with it, my lad. It’s dead, that’s what’s wrong with it!
Shopkeeper: No, no, ‘e’s uh,…it’s resting.
Customer: Look, matey, I know a dead fox when I see one, and I’m looking at one right now.
Shopkeeper: No no it’s not dead, it’s restin’! Remarkable software, Firefox OS, idn’it, ay? Beautiful openness!


QuirksMode: “The problem with Angular”

I’ve previously already expressed my doubts about the how well-suited AngularJS is for mobile web development (in Dutch, though, as I was discussing the merits of the mobile news-site of the Flemish broadcaster VRT).

QuirksMode’s PPK dove in a lot deeper in his “The problem with Angular“, stating amongst other things;

Angular is aimed at corporate IT departments rather than front-enders, many of whom are turned off by its peculiar coding style, its emulation of an HTML templating system that belongs on the server instead of in the browser, and its serious and fundamental performance issues. I’d say Angular is mostly being used by people from a Java background because its coding style is aimed at them. Unfortunately they aren’t trained to recognize Angular’s performance problems.

The performance problems PPK mentions are not the initial download of angular.js in the browser (which is one of the reasons why I dislike it), but the fact that angular.js does a huge amount of DOM-manipulations, which are costly, especially on mobile. This quote says it all;

Although templating is the correct solution, doing it in the browser is fundamentally wrong. The cost of application maintenance should not be offloaded onto all their users’s browsers — especially not the mobile ones. This job belongs on the server.

But do read PPK’s article for more insights on Angular and the road it is heading down with AngularJS 2.0!